
A new service employee is wanted. The position needs to be filled urgently, time is short – and the application arrives at half past midnight. Not by email, but via WhatsApp. The first questions are answered by an AI-supported chatbot, and the date for the trial period is suggested automatically. Everything runs efficiently, quickly and seemingly without any human intervention.
Such processes are no longer a future scenario, but reality. But this is precisely where the question arises: How much should AI be allowed to decide on its own – and when is human control necessary? A new area of tension is emerging between automation and responsibility, which must be handled with sensitivity, especially in labor-intensive industries such as catering and food production.
One of the biggest misconceptions about AI is the belief that it is neutral. However, algorithms are based on training data, which can contain biases or distortions. Anyone who believes that AI is flawless is mistaken. The goal must therefore be to make decisions comprehensible – for example, by disclosing criteria or weightings. Companies should therefore rely on systems that are designed in such a way that processes are transparently visible and documented. In addition, so-called “human in the loop” features then secure the final decision. The AI makes a recommendation – but humans have the final say. This not only creates trust, but also ensures fairness and quality.
Companies must not relinquish control, especially in sensitive areas such as recruiting. AI is a tool – and when used correctly, it is a real superpower for HR and management. It does not replace people, but it significantly expands their capabilities. However, responsibility for its use also lies precisely there. It is therefore crucial that companies define clear responsibilities, document decision-making processes, and be able to intervene manually if necessary. In the event of incorrect decisions or data processing, there must be options for correction – also to be on the safe side in terms of liability law. Trust can only be established where processes remain transparent, traceable, and correctable.
In practice, employees are initially skeptical about AI. The idea that a machine is making decisions about people makes many people uncomfortable. Open communication helps here. Explaining where and how AI reduces the workload—for example, by answering frequently asked questions or automatically scheduling appointments—alleviates fears and creates acceptance. Teams will then see that AI does not take away work, but rather creates space for more important tasks. Control remains with the HR team, and communication becomes faster and more reliable – even via channels such as WhatsApp or Microsoft Teams.
AI offers great potential, especially in the food and beverage industry, where many employees do not have a traditional office workplace and time pressure is high. Today, applications can be initiated via smartphone and chat, relevant information can be retrieved in a matter of minutes and processed directly – even in multiple languages. This not only lowers barriers for applicants, but also speeds up the process enormously.
For example, companies that allow applications via WhatsApp report an 80 percent increase in the number of applicants. This shows that low-threshold, digital processes make all the difference. In addition, AI-supported communication and automation eliminate time-consuming coordination in advance. This allows HR to focus on what matters: getting people excited about work – not bureaucracy.
The future belongs to collaboration between humans and machines. Fully autonomous AI would fail in many human areas, such as empathy, fairness, and diversity. As an intelligent co-pilot, however, it can effectively support HR processes and take them to a new level. In recruiting, AI will play an even greater role in matching and suggestions in the future – for example, through semantic analysis or contextual understanding. Conversations with AI assistants by telephone are also conceivable. Nevertheless, responsibility remains with humans.
Artificial intelligence must not be an opaque black box. Only if it is developed in a comprehensible, ethically sound manner with a clear focus on people can it reach its full potential. This is especially true where trust is the basis of every relationship – in the contact between employers and future employees.
We live in a world that moves faster than we can keep up with. Artificial intelligence writes texts in seconds, booking systems optimise entire hotels, and self-check-in is replacing reception desks. The future unfolds by the second, and yet many people feel as though they are standing still inside.
The paradox of our time is this: technology speeds us up, but it does not help us develop further. Whilst machines are becoming ever more intelligent, we often lose the ability to think clearly, make conscious decisions and be truly present. We live faster, but feel less. We know more, but understand less. And it is precisely in sectors such as the restaurant and hotel industries, which thrive on humanity, that this divide becomes dramatically apparent.
Artificial intelligence has become part of everyday life in many businesses – but by 2026, it will become a structural imperative. The focus is no longer on testing individual tools, but on the question of how AI can be deployed reliably, effectively, and across the entire organization. Examples from tourism, events, and organizations already demonstrate today how scaling works in practice – and where AI specifically reduces the workload.
A clear turning point is emerging for the year 2026. The company-wide deployment of AI is taking center stage. This is the conclusion reached by Hamburg-based AI expert and interim manager Eckhart Hilgenstock, who has analyzed numerous national and international studies on the development of artificial intelligence. His conclusion is clear: “Following the pilot project phase in 2024/25, many companies are aiming to scale AI within their organizations by 2026.”
Dry January is no longer just a month of abstinence. It’s a barometer. For changing guest preferences. For more conscious consumption patterns. For a new aesthetic of enjoyment. Anyone who still believes in 2026 that non-alcoholic drinks are merely lemonade in a crystal glass has failed to grasp the trend. At Bar Montez in the Rosewood Munich, Bar Manager Mario Sel demonstrates just how sophisticated, structured, and gastronomically relevant non-alcoholic creations can be today – and why they have long been a strategic component of contemporary bar culture.
A new service employee is wanted. The position needs to be filled urgently, time is short – and the application arrives at half past midnight. Not by email, but via WhatsApp. The first questions are answered by an AI-supported chatbot, and the date for the trial period is suggested automatically. Everything runs efficiently, quickly and seemingly without any human intervention.
Such processes are no longer a future scenario, but reality. But this is precisely where the question arises: How much should AI be allowed to decide on its own – and when is human control necessary? A new area of tension is emerging between automation and responsibility, which must be handled with sensitivity, especially in labor-intensive industries such as catering and food production.